RESOURCE CENTRE

Tax and Revenue Management: A government’s lifeblood

IT has provided the opportunities for governments to remodel the entire process of tax collection over the last decade. It is, however, a continuously evolving process and governments the world over need to constantly upgrade their tax systems to optimise their revenue workflows.

Unlocking Public Value

A recent SAP study confirmed that those organisations which adopt best practices in the areas of scope and adoption, process standardisation, technology and customer governance, do perform better, and do so as their best practice maturity increases.

Governments and Socialising

The advent of social media has seen governments hopping onto the bandwagon in a bid to further engage citizens.

Follow us on Twitter      |   Join us on    

It’s good to share

I have just finished a very successful and enjoyable week in Australia. The FutureGov forum in Canberra was an opportunity to share views and insights into the key issues faced by federal and state and local government CIOs in Australia. There were more than 100 attendees from three levels of government, as well as IT vendors and international speakers from Europe, New Zealand, and the United States.

Gov 2.0, citizen engagement, open access to data, and consolidation of shared services are the four main areas that I heard during the conversations over the two days, and they are consistent across all levels of government.

The Australian Gov 2.0 TaskForce report, released in December 2009, continues to provide the strategic direction (in the social media world six months is approaching the half-life of any initiative), and in the week before the forum, the Australian government issued the Open Government Declaration.

There continue to be questions about how these fine words will result in actions by government agencies. Stephen Collins (Gov2 activist based in Canberra) gave his take on the event, and Nicholas Gruen followed up his presentation at the Forum with a discussion on public servants participation in Gov2.0. Here is a more cynical take on the current position in Australia.

As readers know, I am always looking for a common thread – the themes that allow us to make sense of the multiple challenges and opportunities. For this forum, I was left with a sense that it’s all about sharing – sharing infrastructure, sharing systems, and sharing experience; sharing data within and across agencies, sharing knowledge and people between teams, projects, agencies and different governments.

Later in the week I was delighted to have the opportunity, with Bill Shrier CTO from Seattle, to attend a lunch with 14 public officials from the Victoria State Government, together with Cisco and FutureGov colleagues. I love Melbourne as a city, and have always thought of the State of Victoria as a world leader in the application of ICT to the business of government and the government of business.

The balance between innovation and cost-reduction has been a key theme of our sector, and getting it right is an important factor for success – the balance needs to reflect the values and strategy of the government and the community. So I was not surprised that while Victoria has a strong infrastructure standardisation agenda, officials are also looking at geospatial, land, and information management for the next wave of innovation.

During the Forum, we were lucky to be able to tap into the experience of public servants from the USA, New Zealand, Netherlands, Austria, and the OECD. Governments can find it difficult to take systems and experience from one jurisdiction and apply them in another – but that is a very effective and powerful method of reducing cost and time to market for new systems, as well as evolving a common approach across boundaries. This applies whether it is different states or cities in the USA, states and territories in Australia, or countries in the Europe Union.

In the future, we will need to pay more attention to the re-use of systems from elsewhere, if we are to meet increasing stakeholder expectations – Ministers, citizens, employees, communities, businesses, other government agencies. Remember, it’s good to share.

3 Comments

On 4 August 2010 Wan wrote:

Interesting article. I do find however some governments still prefer closed walled garden rather than having an open walled. This is because of some sensitive confidential information, security issues and major competitor reasons. Do you think this mindset would diminish in times to come?


On 4 August 2010 Laurence Millar wrote:

Not all government data is created equal.

Some information will always need to be kept in a closed walled garden - maybe for a period of time becuase of commercial or political sensitivity, maybe for a longer time becuase of concerns over national security.

What we need to get used to is the idea that some of the garden is open, and some of the garden is closed, rather than only choosing one option.

I think that the mindset will change over time, because government officials will see the value (economic value and public value) in providing access to information, and will discover that there is very little risk in creating part of the garden as open walled (as long the information placed there is chosen carefully).


On 4 August 2010 Damian Watson wrote:

The context is certainly one of sharing, it is after all a core principle of the Internet.

It reminds me of the Industrial Revolution. Early on nuts and bolts, fittings and fixtures were made for a specific job. Standardisation eventually meant a set of known sizes and specifications was agreed on.

We are moving into that period with the Internet. Why build an engagement platform in one size that doesn't fit with your neighbours?

We are seeing a separation of content from infrastructure. The supplier model is changing - bespoke build will gradually fade out as more and more SaaS applications appear. Suppliers will either be product vendors or content-based service providers.

For government this means investing in new capabilities. Who are the people that can make meaningful use of shared content? How does this level of insight impact on policy-making processes? What does it look like to adapt programmes based on real-time information?

Exciting times!


Add your comment


Magazine

January 2012

Subscribe to the printed version of FutureGov

Magazine

Most highly rated

Better learning with web 2.0 and virtual worlds

In a visit to Ngee Ann Secondary School yesterday (22 July), FutureGov found students deeply ...

Students take a green stance with social media

Ngee Ann Secondary School’s students are on a bid to “change the world” with ...

Will Facebook profiles replace govt web sites?

It’s all the rage for ministries and agencies to have a Facebook pages these ...